NAIL'S RESPONSE TO RECENT SJWC FLYER
It was very disturbing to see San Jose Water Company's
latest mailing to residents. From the
beginning of the community effort to save the Los Gatos Creek watershed NAIL has
been committed to dealing only in facts.. Our information comes from published,
expert sources and the San Jose Water Company's own documents. With that in
mind, here is a point by point refutation of the content in SJWC’s latest flyer mailed to residents.
Please discuss this freely with your friends and neighbors. You will soon be receiving a separate email summarizing recent NAIL efforts to stop the logging
plan.
Thank
you once again for your support.
The NAIL Steering
Committee
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SJWC: NAIL claims the NTMP
"allows for logging to occur in perpetuity without any further public or agency
review once approved by the California Department of
Forestry."
Here is text from the NTMP law. The Legislative findings [4593(c)] give the authority for “approving nonindustrial timber management plans in advance and withdrawing governmental discretion to disapprove nonindustrial timber harvest notices submitted pursuant to the approved nonindustrial timber management plans.”
Here
is an excerpt from a memo written by William Snyder,
Deputy Director, Resource Management, California Department of Forestry to
Registered Professional Foresters on
Unlike a timber harvest plan (THP), an approved NTMP is good forever. It never expires and once approved there is no further public/agency review process per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). There will be some limited inspections during the life of an NTMP made by the California Department of Forestry. CDF will conduct a limited number of site inspections during or following logging operations, and SJWC’s NTMP proposes having some inspections by the California Geological Survey (CGS). But there is no further opportunity for the agencies' function as a review team or for the public to participate at all.
SJWC: NAIL claims that water quality protection will be
compromised since watershed protection and timber harvesting are
"incompatible."
Here are quotes
from published sources on how public water utilities deal with the issue of
logging and watershed protection. None perform logging of the type proposed by
SJWC, a private, for-profit corporation.
East Bay Municipal Utilities
District (EBMUD): "Charles Hardy,
spokesman for the East Bay Municipal Utility District, says logging is a "big
no-no" on its watersheds for "obvious reasons." Uprooting trees loosens the soil
and results in more runoff into water systems when it rains. The only
tree-removal activities his company engages in are to clear paths for fire
trucks and clean out the underbrush to maintain trails." San Jose Metro.
12.7.05
Marin Municipal Water
District: "The Marin Municipal Water District manages 22,000
acres of watershed land and does not allow logging, in order to the keep the
area as pristine as possible. The last time it removed any trees was in 1997.
That was a small population of nonnative pine trees that infringed upon the
native ecosystem. Spokesman Michael Swezy puts it simply: "An undisturbed
watershed is going to yield better-quality water." San Jose Metro 12.7.05
San Francisco Public Utilities
District: "Critics of the logging plan say the company (SJWC) can
reduce the fire risk by thinning trees instead of logging the forest. That is
how the
City of
City
of Portland Oregon: In 1996, The United
States Senate adopted the Oregon Resources Conservation Act (ORCA), S.1662,
which outlaws logging in the 100-square mile area around the Bull Run Reservoir,
the chief source of drinking water for Portland's 800,000 residents. US
Congressional Record
Regarding the Sierra
Club's position on the logging proposed for the Los Gatos Creek Watershed - The
Loma Prieta Chapter of the Sierra Club has stated publicly their opposition to
this plan. For more information on the Sierra Club's position visit their web
site at. http://lomaprieta.sierraclub.org/ForestProtection/Anti-SJWCloggingResolution.html
SJWC. NAIL claims that the NTMP will increase, not
reduce, fire risk.
The State of
Furthermore, in the description of the forest affected by
the 1985 Lexington Fire, the NTMP document states that the smaller trees
suffered the greatest mortality while the largest most mature redwoods survived.
.Yet
the NTMP also states, “While trees in all four size classes will
be harvested, timber marking will focus on tees in each unit that have
diminishing growth rates, particularly those in the 28-34 inch and 36+ inch size
classes.”
This is consistent with NAIL's position that cutting the largest trees in a forest increases fire danger. According to SJWC, 40% of the trees greater than 24” in diameter will be harvested. The average redwood or Douglas Fir in the logging zone is 31” in diameter.
SJWC: NAIL claims that quality of life will be
compromised because harvesting operations will occur 12 hours a day, possibly 12
months of the year, and that the noise will be
unbearable.
The NTMP states
that
logging
will commence at
In the NTMP, SJWC has
requested special permission from the California Department of Forestry to
perform logging operations (including the falling of trees and hauling adjacent
to streams and on county roads) during the wintertime. They also state in their
NTMP that they reserve the right to log more than one unit in a
season.
SJWC included a noise study
in their NTMP whereby they tested noise levels in the
Large Chinook Helicopters
will be used in the 25% of the logging zone along Los Gatos Creek specified for
Helicopter Logging. According to the NTMP document, these helicopters generate
78-92 decibels from 600 feet away. According to the US Occupational Safety &
Health Administration (OSHA), prolonged exposure to 90 decibels or more can lead
to gradual hearing loss. The NTMP states that some
residences will be as close as 150 feet away from helicopter operations. One
landing zone will be within 200 feet of